The Deepfake Dilemma: Navigating the Ethics of AI-Generated Video in 2025

Introduction

The digital landscape is undergoing a profound transformation, marked by the increasing sophistication and prevalence of artificial intelligence. Among the most impactful applications of AI is its ability to generate realistic video content, a capability that has witnessed exponential growth in recent years. Startlingly, in 2023 alone, the number of deepfake videos circulating online reached 95,820, representing an astounding 550% surge since 2019.1 This dramatic increase underscores the urgent need to comprehend the multifaceted implications of this technology. As AI-generated videos become ever more convincing, blurring the lines between genuine and fabricated content, a critical question arises for individuals and society alike: how can we uphold trust in the digital information we consume and effectively protect ourselves from malicious manipulation?

Understanding Deepfakes and Other Forms of AI Video Manipulation

At the heart of the AI video revolution lies the technology of deepfakes. These synthetic media are created using advanced deep learning algorithms, with face-swapping techniques being particularly prevalent.2 These sophisticated algorithms meticulously analyze and then synthesize an individual’s visual and auditory characteristics to generate entirely new content. This process allows for the seamless replication of a person’s appearance, movements, and even speech patterns.2 The accessibility of this technology is further amplified by the availability of open-source tools such as DeepFaceLab, which is reportedly used in over 95% of all deepfake videos, making the creation process more democratized than ever before.4 The speed at which these manipulations can be produced is also noteworthy, with a convincing deepfaked photograph or video potentially achievable in as little as eight minutes.1

Beyond deepfakes, AI’s influence on video manipulation extends to various other forms. The entertainment industry has already embraced AI for tasks ranging from face-swapping actors in films, as seen in the seamless integration of the late Paul Walker in ‘Fast 7’ through a combination of CGI and deepfake technology 2, to the de-aging of actors in blockbuster productions.2 Furthermore, AI is being utilized to enhance visual effects, pushing the boundaries of cinematic realism, and even to generate entirely novel video content from scratch.2 The capabilities of generative AI have advanced to a point where it can now produce synthetic footage that is often virtually indistinguishable from authentic recordings.7

The confluence of the ease and speed of deepfake creation, coupled with the continuous advancements in the sophistication of AI models, is a significant factor driving the rapid expansion of this technology. The sheer volume of the increase in deepfake videos, as evidenced by the 550% rise 1, is likely fueled by the low barrier to entry afforded by user-friendly tools like DeepFaceLab 4 and the remarkably short time required for their production.1 This accessibility empowers a wider range of individuals, not all with benign intentions, to engage in the creation of manipulated video content. Moreover, the continuous progress in AI is leading to a growing challenge in differentiating between what is real and what has been artificially generated. The examples from Hollywood, where AI seamlessly integrates deceased actors or reverses the aging process 2, highlight the advanced capabilities now available. This level of realism makes it increasingly difficult for the average person to confidently discern the authenticity of video content encountered online.

The Potential for Misinformation and Malicious Use

The ethical concerns surrounding AI-generated video content are largely rooted in its potential for misuse, particularly in the realms of misinformation and malicious activities. Deepfakes have emerged as a potent tool for disinformation campaigns, capable of manipulating the words and actions of political figures to sway public opinion.2 Several instances have already surfaced, including a deepfake video that falsely depicted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urging his army to lay down their arms 8, and a deepfake audio that mimicked President Biden’s voice in an attempt to discourage voting.2 The rapid and widespread dissemination of such deepfakes is significantly facilitated by social media platforms, which play a critical role in amplifying the already prevalent issue of misinformation.8 In 2023, an estimated 500,000 video and voice deepfakes were shared across social media platforms globally, underscoring the scale of this challenge.1

Beyond political manipulation, deepfakes are increasingly being leveraged for fraudulent and financial scams, with reported cases surging by 3,000% in 2023.5 Voice cloning technology, in particular, presents a significant threat, enabling criminals to convincingly impersonate individuals and potentially deceive their loved ones into transferring funds; alarmingly, one in ten people have reported receiving such cloned messages.4 Businesses are also becoming frequent targets, with over 10% having experienced attempted or successful deepfake fraud, resulting in substantial financial losses. A notable example includes the theft of $25 million from a British engineering firm through the use of deepfake technology.1 The cryptocurrency sector appears to be particularly vulnerable, accounting for a staggering 88% of all detected deepfake fraud cases in 2023.5

Furthermore, deepfakes pose a serious threat to individual reputations and personal security. They can be used to create fabricated videos or audio recordings that falsely portray individuals in compromising situations or making statements they never did, leading to significant reputational damage and online harassment.8 Non-consensual pornography is another deeply concerning application, with the vast majority of deepfakes being pornographic in nature and often targeting women, including celebrities and social media influencers.1 Even younger individuals are not immune, with documented cases of sexually explicit deepfakes being created of teenage female classmates.4

The misuse of deepfakes is no longer confined to mere celebrity impersonations; it has evolved into more sinister forms of manipulation, including deliberate interference in political processes and increasingly sophisticated financial fraud schemes. This shift indicates a growing level of expertise and malicious intent behind the creation of these deceptive videos. The ease with which voice cloning technology can now be employed, often requiring only a minimal audio sample, significantly increases the risk of highly personalized and convincing social engineering attacks. The fact that a mere three seconds of audio can suffice to generate an 85% accurate voice clone 4, coupled with the rising popularity of readily available voice cloning software 4, suggests a lowering of the technical barrier for malicious actors to create realistic voice deepfakes for vishing and impersonation scams. Moreover, the alarmingly high prevalence of pornographic deepfakes, many of which are created without consent and specifically target women, highlights a major ethical and privacy violation that demands immediate and focused attention. The sheer scale of this issue underscores the urgent need for effective countermeasures and preventative strategies.

Copyright Issues and Ownership of AI-Generated Content

The emergence of AI in video creation has also brought forth complex questions surrounding copyright and intellectual property ownership. A fundamental principle in copyright law is the requirement of human authorship, and the U.S. Copyright Office has firmly stated that only works created by human beings are eligible for copyright protection. Consequently, content that is generated entirely by artificial intelligence is generally not subject to copyright.13 This position reinforces the long-standing legal framework that safeguards original expressions of authorship originating from human creativity.14 Even minimal human input, such as simply providing a brief text prompt to an AI image or video generator, is typically not considered sufficient to establish copyright eligibility.14

However, the scenario becomes more nuanced when considering AI-assisted creation. In cases where a human creator actively selects, edits, and arranges AI-generated elements with a significant degree of creative judgment, they may be able to claim copyright protection over the resulting work. It is important to note that this protection would likely only extend to the human-authored portions of the creation.14 Similarly, if AI is utilized as a tool within a broader creative process, where human input plays a substantial role in shaping the final output, the parts of the work attributable to human authorship may be eligible for copyright.14 The Copyright Office emphasizes that for a work involving AI to qualify for copyright, the human contribution must be substantial, clearly demonstrable, and independently capable of being copyrighted.14

Another critical legal area concerns the use of copyrighted material to train AI models. This practice has become a significant point of contention, with several copyright holders initiating legal action against AI companies, alleging unauthorized use of their content.17 For instance, lawsuits have been filed against AI developers for utilizing copyrighted song lyrics and digital sound recordings to train their models without obtaining the necessary permissions.18 The legal framework in this area is still under development, and future court decisions are expected to play a crucial role in establishing precedents and potentially shaping the future landscape of licensing agreements for AI training data.18

The existing copyright law, with its emphasis on human authorship, presents a considerable challenge for those seeking to protect purely AI-generated video content. This could potentially impact the incentives for creators who heavily rely on AI tools in their workflow. The clear stance of the Copyright Office against granting copyright to solely AI-generated works 13 implies that creators who utilize AI extensively might find themselves without full legal protection for their creations under current regulations, which could, in turn, influence the development and dissemination of such content. Furthermore, the legal distinction drawn between AI as a mere tool and AI as the sole originator is vital in determining copyright eligibility. This underscores the continued importance of significant human creative input as a prerequisite for securing intellectual property rights in the context of AI-assisted video production. The ongoing legal battles surrounding the use of copyrighted material for training AI systems strongly suggest a potential future where licensing models become more prevalent. This development could have a substantial impact on the costs and overall accessibility of training data, which is fundamental to the advancement of AI video generation technologies.

The Impact on Human Video Creators and the Creative Industry

The rise of AI in video production is undeniably transforming the roles and responsibilities of human video creators and is having a significant impact on the broader creative industry. One of the most immediate effects is the automation of numerous repetitive tasks that are traditionally part of the video editing process. AI tools are now capable of automating tasks such as cutting sequences, adjusting audio levels, and adding visual effects, leading to considerable time savings and reduced production costs.21 AI-powered video editors can now perform tasks like scene cutting, sound adjustment, and even error detection at speeds that far surpass human capabilities.21 Additionally, AI is streamlining workflows through features like automated background removal and voice recognition for generating transcriptions.21

As AI takes over these more mundane and time-consuming aspects of video production, the role of human video editors is evolving. There is a noticeable shift towards AI supervision and a greater focus on strategic content development, allowing human editors to concentrate on the more creative and nuanced aspects of storytelling and overall quality control.23 This transformation is also giving rise to entirely new job opportunities within the industry. Roles such as AI workflow specialists, who are adept at optimizing production pipelines using automation, data-driven storytellers, who combine creative vision with analytical insights, and virtual set designers, who create immersive digital environments, are becoming increasingly in demand.21 Moreover, AI is serving as a valuable assistant to human designers by automating technical tasks, thereby freeing up their time and mental energy to focus on the core elements of narrative and artistic design.22

Despite these advancements and the emergence of new roles, there are legitimate concerns within the creative industry regarding the potential for job displacement. As AI becomes increasingly proficient in producing high-quality video content, there is a fear that it could eventually replace human writers, editors, and other content creators, leading to job losses.24 Some industry reports have even predicted a substantial impact on employment within the entertainment sector due to the increasing adoption of AI automation.25 However, many experts in the field argue that the impact of AI will be more of an evolution of existing roles rather than a complete elimination of jobs. They believe that AI will primarily function as a powerful tool to augment human creativity and enhance productivity, rather than entirely supplanting human talent.21

While AI is indeed automating many of the technical facets of video creation, it is simultaneously fostering the development of new, more specialized roles that demand a unique combination of technical AI proficiency and creative strategic thinking. This suggests a significant transformation within the industry, rather than a simple reduction in the overall number of job opportunities. Furthermore, the increasing accessibility of AI video creation tools is democratizing the process of video production. This allows individuals and small businesses to generate professional-quality content without the need for extensive financial resources or large production teams, which could lead to increased competition within the industry. The growing demand for professionals who possess expertise in utilizing these new AI tools also points to a potential skills gap in the immediate future. This highlights the critical importance for individuals currently working in the video creation industry to proactively engage in upskilling and adapting to these rapid technological advancements to ensure their continued relevance and competitiveness in the evolving job market.

Current and Future Regulations and Detection Technologies

The ethical and societal implications of AI-generated video content, particularly deepfakes, have spurred significant activity in the regulatory landscape. Many countries and regions are in the process of proposing or implementing AI-related legislation aimed at addressing a wide range of concerns, including safety, ethical considerations, and the potential for misuse, with deepfakes being a primary focus.28 A notable example is the European Union’s AI Act, which came into force in August 2024. This comprehensive legislation establishes regulations for AI systems based on their perceived level of risk, and it includes specific transparency obligations for providers of generative AI technologies.28

In the United States, while there is currently no overarching federal regulation governing artificial intelligence, various states have introduced their own AI-related bills. Additionally, federal agencies such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are increasingly focusing on issues of consumer protection within the context of AI applications.28 Some of the proposed and enacted regulations specifically target harmful applications of AI, such as the creation of sexually explicit deepfakes, and mandate the disclosure of AI-generated content in sensitive areas like political advertising to ensure greater transparency and accountability.28

Alongside the development of regulations, there is a significant and ongoing effort in the realm of technology to improve the detection of deepfake videos. Researchers and technology companies are actively developing sophisticated AI-powered tools and algorithms designed to identify manipulated content with greater accuracy.10 These detection methods typically involve analyzing various visual and audio cues within a video, looking for subtle inconsistencies in facial features, unnatural patterns in lighting, discrepancies in lip-syncing accuracy, and any other indicators of artificial manipulation or unnatural movements.10 Furthermore, techniques such as behavioral analytics, which examines patterns of user interaction, and fraud network detection, which identifies interconnected suspicious activities, are also being employed to uncover deepfakes and the networks behind their creation.2 While some of these AI detection tools boast impressive accuracy rates, often exceeding 90%, their effectiveness can significantly diminish when confronted with novel deepfake generation techniques, highlighting a continuous “arms race” between those creating deepfakes and those trying to detect them.41

Despite the advancements in detection technology, there are inherent limitations. Individuals with a thorough understanding of how these detection systems operate can often devise methods to evade them. Deepfake creators can intentionally introduce subtle adjustments to their creations that are specifically designed to bypass the analytical parameters of existing detection tools.43 Moreover, the ability of current deepfake detection systems to generalize effectively remains a challenge. These systems often struggle to accurately identify manipulated content that has been generated using techniques that were not part of their original training data.43 Consequently, relying solely on deepfake detection technology can create a false sense of security. The results provided by these tools can sometimes be ambiguous or even misleading, further complicating the process of verifying the authenticity of video content.43

The current regulatory landscape surrounding AI-generated content is characterized by fragmentation and rapid evolution. This poses a significant challenge for both businesses and individuals who need to navigate the varying requirements and ensure compliance. The lack of clear and unified global standards underscores the need for greater international cooperation and harmonization in this area. Furthermore, the ongoing dynamic between the development of deepfake generation techniques and the corresponding detection technologies resembles a continuous arms race. As deepfakes become more sophisticated and harder to identify, detection methods must constantly adapt and improve to keep pace with these advancements. This necessitates sustained research and development in the field of AI-powered detection. While AI-powered detection tools offer valuable assistance in identifying potential deepfakes, their inherent limitations in generalization and susceptibility to evasion mean that a comprehensive strategy for combating deepfakes must involve a multi-faceted approach. This includes not only technological solutions but also robust user education initiatives to raise awareness about the risks and characteristics of deepfakes, as well as the implementation of stringent verification processes, particularly when dealing with sensitive or potentially harmful information.

FAQ Section:

  • What are the main ethical concerns surrounding AI-generated videos?
  • The primary ethical concerns associated with AI-generated videos encompass a range of issues, including the potential for the widespread dissemination of misinformation and the manipulation of public opinion, which can have profound societal and political consequences.8 Furthermore, the use of deepfakes for fraudulent activities and sophisticated financial scams poses a significant threat to both individuals and organizations.4 The creation and distribution of non-consensual pornography and the potential for severe reputational damage through manipulated content are also major ethical considerations.1 Copyright infringement issues arise when AI models are trained on copyrighted material or when AI generates content that infringes upon existing intellectual property rights.13 Fundamentally, the increasing realism of AI-generated videos raises concerns about the erosion of trust and the authenticity of information in the digital age.41 The inherent lack of transparency in some AI algorithms and the potential for them to perpetuate or even amplify existing societal biases further compound these ethical challenges.24
  • How can I spot a deepfake video?
  • Identifying a deepfake video requires a keen eye for detail and an understanding of the common artifacts that AI manipulation can produce. One should look for inconsistencies in facial features, such as unnatural blinking patterns or an unnaturally smooth or waxy skin texture.10 Discrepancies between the audio and the lip movements of the speaker are often telltale signs of manipulation.10 Observing the overall movement of the head and body for any unnatural or jittery motions, as well as examining the background for any distortions or blurring, can also be helpful.10 Pay close attention to the lighting and shadows within the video, as deepfakes often struggle to accurately replicate natural light interplay.38 The audio quality itself can provide clues; listen for robotic or flat tones, or any unnatural pauses in speech.38 Utilizing reverse image and video search engines can sometimes reveal if the content has been previously identified as manipulated or AI-generated. Finally, specialized AI deepfake detection software can analyze videos for subtle anomalies that may not be readily apparent to the human eye.10
  • What are the legal implications of using AI to create videos?
  • The legal ramifications of using AI in video creation are primarily centered around copyright law. In the United States, content that is solely generated by artificial intelligence is generally not eligible for copyright protection due to the requirement of human authorship.13 Furthermore, the act of using copyrighted materials, such as images, video footage, or music, to train AI models can lead to significant legal disputes with copyright holders who may claim unauthorized use of their intellectual property.17 The creation and subsequent distribution of deepfake videos can also have serious legal consequences, potentially leading to charges related to defamation if the content harms someone’s reputation, privacy violations if an individual’s likeness is used without consent, and the creation or dissemination of illegal content, such as child pornography.32 The regulatory landscape is continuously evolving, with some jurisdictions implementing laws that mandate the clear disclosure of AI-generated content, particularly in sensitive areas such as political advertisements, to ensure transparency for the public.35
  • Will AI replace human video creators?
  • While artificial intelligence is undeniably automating many of the more technical and repetitive aspects of video production, it is highly unlikely to completely supplant human video creators.21 Instead, the roles within the video production industry are undergoing a transformation. AI is increasingly being used to handle time-consuming and labor-intensive tasks, allowing human creators to focus on the more strategic, creative, and nuanced elements of their work, such as storytelling, artistic vision, and overall quality control.22 Moreover, the emergence of AI has also led to the creation of entirely new job roles that require specialized expertise in AI video tools and workflows.21 The prevailing view among industry experts is that AI will primarily serve as a powerful tool to augment human capabilities, making the process of video creation more efficient, accessible, and ultimately more creative, rather than simply replacing the essential role of human ingenuity and artistic talent.21
  • What is being done to address the ethical challenges of AI video?
  • Numerous efforts are underway to tackle the ethical challenges posed by AI-generated video content. These include the development of comprehensive ethical guidelines and frameworks designed to promote responsible AI development and deployment across various sectors.48 Regulatory bodies and governmental organizations around the world are actively working on formulating and implementing legislation aimed at addressing critical issues such as the spread of misinformation, the rise of AI-driven fraud, and the proliferation of non-consensual deepfakes.28 Researchers in both academia and industry are continuously striving to advance the capabilities of deepfake detection technologies, seeking to create more robust and reliable methods for identifying manipulated video content.10 Promoting transparency and the clear disclosure of AI-generated content is also being emphasized as a crucial ethical practice, and in some cases, it is becoming a legal requirement, particularly in contexts where the potential for deception is high.31 Finally, public awareness campaigns and media literacy initiatives play a vital role in educating individuals about the nature and potential implications of deepfakes, empowering them to critically evaluate the video content they encounter online.50

Viral Insight Section:

By the year 2027, the realism of sophisticated AI deepfakes is anticipated to reach a point where the average human’s ability to discern them from genuine videos without the aid of specialized tools will likely fall below 50%. This increasing difficulty in human detection will necessitate the widespread adoption of AI-powered detection software as a standard practice for verifying the authenticity of digital video content.1

The escalating use of deepfakes in perpetrating corporate fraud is projected to lead to global financial losses exceeding $10 billion by the year 2030. This significant financial risk will likely drive a substantial increase in cybersecurity investments, with a particular focus on developing and implementing advanced technologies for deepfake prevention and detection within corporate environments.4

Within the next five years, it is probable that regulations will mandate the inclusion of digital watermarks and the implementation of provenance tracking systems for all AI-generated video content that is intended for public consumption. This regulatory shift will likely foster the growth of a new industry centered around digital content authentication and verification, providing tools and services to ensure the trustworthiness of online video.28

Conclusion

The ethical considerations surrounding AI-generated video content present a multifaceted and rapidly evolving challenge in our increasingly digital world. The potential for deepfakes and other AI manipulation techniques to erode trust, spread misinformation, and cause harm necessitates a comprehensive and proactive approach involving technological advancements, robust regulations, and heightened public awareness. As AI continues to evolve, so too must our strategies for navigating this complex landscape. Subscribe to our insights for weekly updates on AI video ethics and emerging trends.

Further Reading:

  1. U.S. Copyright Office. (2025). Copyright and Artificial Intelligence Part 2: Copyrightability.
  2. McKinsey & Company. (2025). The State of AI: How organizations are rewiring to capture value.
  3. IEEE. (2024). The Impact of Technology in 2025 and Beyond: an IEEE Global Study.

Key Valuable Tables:

Table 1: Comparison of Human-Created vs. AI-Generated Video Characteristics

CharacteristicHuman-Created VideoAI-Generated Video
CreativityHighLimited
OriginalityTypically HighOften Referenced
Speed of ProductionVariesVery High
Cost-EffectivenessHigherLower
Ability to EmoteHighLimited
Technical AccuracyHighHigh
ScalabilityLowerHigh
Need for Human OversightLowerHigher

Works cited

  1. 70 Deepfake Statistics You Need To Know (2024) – Spiralytics, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.spiralytics.com/blog/deepfake-statistics/
  2. What Are Deepfakes, and How Can You Spot Them? 2025 – Sumsub, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://sumsub.com/blog/what-are-deepfakes/
  3. What are deepfakes and how can we detect them? – The Alan Turing Institute, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.turing.ac.uk/blog/what-are-deepfakes-and-how-can-we-detect-them
  4. 2024 Deepfakes Guide and Statistics – Security.org, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.security.org/resources/deepfake-statistics/
  5. Deepfake statistics (2025): 25 new facts for CFOs – eftsure, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://eftsure.com/statistics/deepfake-statistics/
  6. Deepfakes in the Real World – Applications and Ethics – viso.ai, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://viso.ai/deep-learning/deepfakes-in-the-real-world-applications-and-ethics/
  7. The Future of AI in Video Production: Innovations and Impacts – Filmustage Blog, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://filmustage.com/blog/the-future-of-ai-in-video-production-innovations-and-impacts/
  8. Deepfakes and Their Impact on Society – CPI OpenFox, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.openfox.com/deepfakes-and-their-impact-on-society/
  9. Top 5 Cases of AI Deepfake Fraud From 2024 Exposed | Blog – Incode, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://incode.com/blog/top-5-cases-of-ai-deepfake-fraud-from-2024-exposed/
  10. How to Detect Deepfakes in 2025: The Growing Challenge of AI-Generated Manipulation, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://deepmedia.ai/blog/detect-deepfakes-2025
  11. (PDF) Understanding the Impact of AI-Generated Deepfakes on Public Opinion, Political Discourse, and Personal Security in Social Media – ResearchGate, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381277089_Understanding_the_Impact_of_AI-Generated_Deepfakes_on_Public_Opinion_Political_Discourse_and_Personal_Security_in_Social_Media
  12. Navigating the Mirage: Ethical, Transparency, and Regulatory Challenges in the Age of Deepfakes | Walton College | University of Arkansas, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://walton.uark.edu/insights/posts/navigating-the-mirage-ethical-transparency-and-regulatory-challenges-in-the-age-of-deepfakes.php
  13. What are the most common copyright concerns when using AI upscalers – TensorPix, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://tensorpix.ai/blog/what-are-the-most-common-copyright-concerns-when-using-AI-upscalers
  14. Recent Developments in AI, Art & Copyright: Copyright Office Report & New Registrations, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://itsartlaw.org/2025/03/04/recent-developments-in-ai-art-copyright-copyright-office-report-new-registrations/
  15. Generative AI in Focus: Copyright Office’s Latest Report – Wiley Rein LLP, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.wiley.law/alert-Generative-AI-in-Focus-Copyright-Offices-Latest-Report
  16. Copyright Office Releases Part 2 of Artificial Intelligence Report, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.copyright.gov/newsnet/2025/1060.html
  17. AI Content Rules: YouTube, Spotify & Audible 2025 – Descript, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.descript.com/blog/article/ai-content-on-youtube-spotify-audible
  18. IP in the Age of AI: What Today’s Cases Teach Us About the Future of the Legal Landscape, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/business_law/resources/business-law-today/2025-february/ip-age-of-ai/
  19. Federal Court Sides with Plaintiff in the First Major AI Copyright Decision of 2025, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.jw.com/news/insights-federal-court-ai-copyright-decision/
  20. Lessons Learned from 2024 and the Year Ahead in AI Litigation | 01 | 2025 | Publications, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.debevoise.com/insights/publications/2025/01/lessons-learned-from-2024-and-the-year-ahead-in-ai
  21. How AI and Technology Are Changing Video Making Jobs in 2025 – Kosmic AI, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.kosmic.ai/blog/how-ai-and-technology-are-changing-video-making-jobs-in-2025
  22. AI: its impact on video content creation – Yuzzit, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.yuzzit.video/en/resources/impact-ai-video-content-creation
  23. Video Editing Jobs will drastically change with AI – Argil AI, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.argil.ai/blog/video-editing-jobs-will-drastically-change-with-ai
  24. The Reality and Risks of Using AI for Content Creation: Facts! – Smart VAs, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://smartvirtualassistants.com/blog/the-reality-and-risks-of-using-ai-for-content-creation-facts
  25. Revolution or Disruption? The impact of AI in Entertainment & Media – TalentDesk, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.talentdesk.io/blog/ai-impact-on-the-entertainment-industry
  26. Y’all think Ai will replace video editors in the near future? : r/VideoEditing – Reddit, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/VideoEditing/comments/1arzz56/yall_think_ai_will_replace_video_editors_in_the/
  27. AI in Creative Industries: Enhancing, rather than replacing, human creativity in TV and film, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.alixpartners.com/insights/102jsme/ai-in-creative-industries-enhancing-rather-than-replacing-human-creativity-in/
  28. AI Regulations around the World – 2025 – Mind Foundry, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.mindfoundry.ai/blog/ai-regulations-around-the-world
  29. The Future of AI Compliance—Preparing for New Global and State Laws – Smith Anderson, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.smithlaw.com/newsroom/publications/the-future-of-ai-compliance-preparing-for-new-global-and-state-laws
  30. AI Act | Shaping Europe’s digital future – European Union, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai
  31. Everything We Know About Generative AI Regulation in 2024 – Basis Technologies, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://basis.com/blog/everything-we-know-about-generative-ai-regulation-in-2024
  32. Artificial Intelligence 2025 Legislation – National Conference of State Legislatures, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.ncsl.org/technology-and-communication/artificial-intelligence-2025-legislation
  33. AI Watch: Global regulatory tracker – United States | White & Case LLP, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.whitecase.com/insight-our-thinking/ai-watch-global-regulatory-tracker-united-states
  34. The Outlook of US AI Regulations in 2025: A Concise Summary – Zartis, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.zartis.com/us-artificial-intelligence-regulations-in-2025-a-concise-summary/
  35. Summary Artificial Intelligence 2024 Legislation – National Conference of State Legislatures, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.ncsl.org/technology-and-communication/artificial-intelligence-2024-legislation
  36. US state-by-state AI legislation snapshot | BCLP – Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.bclplaw.com/en-US/events-insights-news/us-state-by-state-artificial-intelligence-legislation-snapshot.html
  37. Deepfake Trends to Look Out for in 2025 – Pindrop, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.pindrop.com/article/deepfake-trends/
  38. Is This Even Real? How to Detect A Deepfake Video – AI or Not, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.aiornot.com/blog/how-to-detect-deepfake-video
  39. How to Spot a DeepFake Video: 9 Essential Tips – BombBomb, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://bombbomb.com/how-to-spot-a-deepfake-video-nine-essential-tips/
  40. Detect DeepFakes: How to counteract misinformation created by AI – MIT Media Lab, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.media.mit.edu/projects/detect-fakes/overview/
  41. Deepfake disruption: A cybersecurity-scale challenge and its far-reaching consequences – Deloitte, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/technology/technology-media-and-telecom-predictions/2025/gen-ai-trust-standards.html
  42. SP Cup – 2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://2025.ieeeicassp.org/sp-cup/
  43. What Journalists Should Know About Deepfake Detection in 2025, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.cjr.org/tow_center/what-journalists-should-know-about-deepfake-detection-technology-in-2025-a-non-technical-guide.php
  44. The Ethical & Legal Challenges of AI in Media | Ring Publishing – News and Solutions, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://ringpublishing.com/blog/ai-tools-and-insights/the-ethical-and-legal-challenges-of-ai-in-media/4g2vh4b
  45. Top 4 Real Life Ethical Issue in Artificial Intelligence | 2023 – XenonStack, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.xenonstack.com/blog/ethical-issue-ai
  46. The ethical dilemmas of AI | USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://annenberg.usc.edu/research/center-public-relations/usc-annenberg-relevance-report/ethical-dilemmas-ai
  47. Answering Deepfake FAQs – Aware, Inc., accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.aware.com/answering-deepfake-faqs-blog/
  48. All creatives should know about the ethics of AI-generated images | Lummi, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.lummi.ai/blog/ethics-of-ai-generated-images
  49. Ethics of Generative AI: Key Considerations [2025] – Aegis Softtech, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.aegissofttech.com/ethics-of-generative-ai.html
  50. Ethics of Artificial Intelligence | UNESCO, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics
  51. AI-UGC: Navigating FTC Rules & Ethical Considerations in 2025 – Vidpros, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://vidpros.com/ftc-guidelines-for-ai-ugc-creation/
  52. Listen carefully: UF study could lead to better deepfake detection, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://news.ufl.edu/2024/11/deepfakes-audio/
  53. U.S. Legislative Trends in AI-Generated Content: 2024 and Beyond, accessed on April 14, 2025, https://fpf.org/blog/u-s-legislative-trends-in-ai-generated-content-2024-and-beyond/
Tags